🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has maintained a prohibition on deploying national guard in the Oregon city, following a latest legal decision.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court decided on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an larger panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the administration.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent turn in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the authority and justification to send state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city enacted two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to evade the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing control of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the physical sending of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The constitution limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, principles, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the judicial system.”